Those who have worked closely with leftists or who have been exposed to their beliefs in other ways know what evil lurks in the hearts of many of them. Yet, it’s still shocking to hear them express their views aloud. Thanks to Project Veritas, we now have a clearer picture of the evil that lurks at PBS and anywhere else leftists live and move and have their being.

In a must-see-to-believe undercover video, Michael Beller, “a contracts lawyer in PBS’ general counsel office,” shares the sentiments and dreams of leftists. Don’t be deceived by his firing that he is the only leftist at PBS who holds these views. These are common views among leftists.

To summarize, Beller says the following:

• The left intends to take Republican voters’ children away from them.

• The left intends to put these children in “re-education camps.”

• Trump is “close to Hitler.”

• If Biden didn’t win, Beller wanted to “go to the White House and throw Molotov cocktails.”

• Trump supporters “are raising a generation of intolerant people –horrible kids.”

• “Enlightenment camps,” also referred to as “re-education” camps are “nice.” They have “Sesame Street characters in the classrooms, and they watch PBS all day.”

• Americans are “f**king dumb.”

• He’s glad to live in D.C. “where people are educated and know stuff.” He can’t “imagine” living in one of the other towns or states where everybody’s just … stupid.”

• He thought it was “great” when “COVID” was spiking in “red states” because “either those people” wouldn’t “come out to vote for Trump” or “a lot of them are sick and dying” (said with a chuckle).

Beller is not alone. Many leftists believe the government should take children away from parents who teach, for example, that volitional homosexual acts are immoral; that unions between two people of the same sex are not and never can be, in reality, marriage; and that social, chemical, and surgical interventions for children who experience gender dysphoria are harmful and sinful.

Many leftists believe all children should be re-educated in government “enlightenment camps.” Many leftists want to ban Christian private schools and homeschools. Leftists, like conservatives, believe their moral and ontological assumptions are true, and right, and good. The difference between leftists and conservatives, however, is conservatives believe parents—not the government or its disciples in government schools—have the right to decide which moral and ontological views their own children will be taught. In other words, conservative parents lack the hubris of leftists.

Many leftists support the insidious use of children’s programming—like Sesame Street—to  promote arguable moral propositions from the homosexuality and “trans”-cultic communities to preschoolers who have no capacity to understand the foundational issues.

The goal of leftists is not understanding. The goal is indoctrination.

They use imagery and narrative to shape the feelings of little ones long before they are capable of understanding the grounding for the implicit moral and ontological arguments on which leftist beliefs rest. Leftists also teach children that anyone who thinks differently is full of hate and fear. But their job isn’t quite done.

By the time children are old enough to understand the intellectual grounding for moral claims as well as the nature of the cultural debate on diverse moral issues, leftists in government schools censor dissenting material. Then all leftists have to do to keep “enlightened” children in ideological line is hurl a few epithets, like “bigot,” “homophobe,” or “transphobe” at dissenters, and the blinded eyes of propagandized children become blinded by rage.

Leftists have become the villagers in Shirley Jackson’s famous short story “The Lottery,” who demand conformity to unexamined beliefs. Like Jackson’s well-trained community, today’s well-trained, unthinking children pick up their stones and destroy.

Maybe it’s time to stop compelling Americans to subsidize the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to the tune of $445 million annually. If Americans think CPB and PBS are worthy projects, they can fund them voluntarily. It is not the job of the federal government or state governments to fund everything potentially good. We’ve completely lost sight of the proper role of government.

Since Beller now has some time on his hands, I am extending an open invitation to come to Illinois and meet some “stupid” deplorables and their “horrible” kids, since it’s obvious he doesn’t know any.

Listen to this article read by Laurie: 

Click HERE to learn about supporting IFI on a monthly basis.

Well, well, well, the Facebook Overlords were busy censoring even on Sunday. Neither peace nor rest for the wicked, it seems.

Sunday, IFI was notified that the Overlords, in their infinite ignorance, had determined that a post written and posted on IFI’s Facebook page by me on Thursday night violated their “Community Standards” on “Hate Speech.” The post was about the openly homosexual, flamboyant, cross-dressing actor Billy Porter’s upcoming appearance on Sesame Street—a PBS television program for preschoolers paid for by the public (Add this appearance to the swelling list of ways the normalization of sexual deviance affects everyone, despite the claim from liars who have long said it would affect no one except those who directly engage in it).

The Overlords falsely claimed that the post was “Hate Speech,” which is defined by the Facebook Overlords as “dehumanizing speech, statements of inferiority, or calls for exclusion or segregation” based on “what we call protected characteristics — race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, and serious disease or disability.” (emphasis added)

Here’s the banned post:

Sesame Street is all in on inculcating the nation’s little ones with the dogma of sexual anarchists. They’ve announced on their FB page that openly homosexual, cross-dressing, faux-married actor Billy Porter will be a guest.

“It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin (Luke 17:2).”

Christian Parents: Get your kids out of government indoctrination hellholes. No Christian should have their child in a “school” that introduces egregious sexual deviance to little children, that presents sexual deviance positively, and that sexually integrates private spaces. In Illinois, starting next fall, that’s every school at every level.

Churches: Make it possible for your families to get their kids out of government indoctrination hellholes. They share the same damnable mission to promote the same damnable ideology that Sesame Street does.

Christian Teachers Working in Government Indoctrination Hellholes: No Christ-follower has a moral right to teach evil ideas to children or to use incorrect pronouns when referring to students who seek to pass as the sex they aren’t.

By calling theologically orthodox views of sexual immorality “hate speech,” Facebook engaged in “hate speech” based on “religious affiliation,” thereby violating its own Community Standards.

Word to the Overlords: Expressions of moral disapproval of volitional acts that you Overlords celebrate do not constitute hatred of persons no matter how many times you claim they do.

Our time is so dark that society rejoices in exposing toddlers to cross-dressing and homosexuality, and heaps condemnation on those who call such perversion wicked.

Hey Christians, you know those lumps you keep tripping on in the darkness? They’re dead canaries.

“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20)

“Please share this article before Facebook deletes it.”

Listen to this article read by Laurie:

https://staging.illinoisfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Facebook-Removes-IFI-Post.mp3

IFI is hosting our annual Worldview Conference on March 7th at the Village Church of Barrington. This year’s conference is titled “Thinking Biblically About Our Corrosive Culture” and features Dr. Michael Brown and Dr. Rob Gagnon. For more information, please click HERE for a flyer or click the button below to register for the conference.

Euphemistic language is an essential tool of all efforts to promote evil as good. Watch anti-life, anti-woman, anti-human-rights “feminist” Sophie Lewis defend human slaughter through such absurd language-torturing that it would be comical if it weren’t serving such an evil end:

Lewis:

In the past the strategies that our side has tended to use have included a kind of ceding of ground to our enemies. We tend to say that abortion is, indeed, very bad, but we say, “Luckily it’s not killing, luckily it’s just a healthcare right.”

We have very little to lose at the moment when it comes to abortion, and I’m interested in winning radically. And I wonder if we could think about defending abortion as a right to stop doing gestational work.

Abortion is, in my opinion—and I recognize how controversial this is—a form of killing. It’ s a form of killing that we need to be able to defend. I am not interested in where a human life starts to exist…. The other end of the spectrum is learning to die well… and let each other go at the end of our lives as well as the beginning.

But looking at the biology of this kind of hemochorial placentation helps me think about the violence, that, innocently, a fetus metes out vis-a-vis a gestator. And that violence is an unacceptable violence for someone who does not want to do gestational work. The violence that the gestator metes out to essentially go on strike, or exit that workplace, is an acceptable violence.

Now that panicked, anti-life dogmatists can no longer deny that the product of conception between two humans is a human, they’ve shifted into rhetorical overdrive, saying, “Well, of course, it’s human, but it’s not a person,” the womb is a “work place,” pregnancy is “gestational work,” and  human gestation is “violence.” At least she admitted abortion kills.

But after acknowledging that abortion “is a form of killing,” Lewis shockingly admits to being completely uninterested in figuring out if the living thing being killed is a human life. In admitting such extraordinary incuriosity (especially for a scholar), she implicitly concedes that abortion may kill a human being. Only sociopaths have no qualms about killing innocent humans.

In addition to being morally flawed, her statement is nonsensical. It’s inarguable that the object growing in a woman’s womb is living because you can’t kill something that is non-living, and Lewis admitted abortion is killing.  And it’s inarguable that the product of conception between two humans is a human. Lewis knows that abortion kills, she knows that the thing abortion kills is alive, and she knows that the living thing abortion kills is a human.

“What the heck is ‘hemochorial placentation,’ you may be asking yourself, and how does it do “violence” to “gestators”? Defining it is easy-peasy. “Hemachorial placentation” is a $10 technical term that refers to the natural process by which a mother’s body sustains her developing offspring by bathing his or her chorion (outer layer of tissue enveloping the baby) in nutrient-rich blood (hemo) via the placenta (placentation).

Hemachorial placentation doesn’t mete out violence—innocently or otherwise—unless, of course, “violence” is redefined to include non-violent, natural processes. Lewis needs to redefine this natural process as violence in order to justify the actual violence mothers and their hired killers mete out to humans in the womb—humans that have no part in nor cause the alleged “violence” of “hemochorial placentation.”

Lewis, author of the book Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family, should be able to notice the difference between letting “each other go at the end of our lives” and voluntarily snuffing out others at the beginning of their lives.

As demonstrated by both the anti-woman Lewis and the moral empty shells at Governor JB Pritzker’s Kill-Babies-Bill celebration—shells held upright by a constant refilling of hot air and puffed-up pride—euphemisms are the stock-in-trade of every Leftist.

Recently, New York Times writer Alan Blinder (I kid you not) said this (I kid you not):

Louisiana lawmakers voted on Wednesday to ban [abortion] after the pulsing of what becomes the fetus’s heart can be detected…. The measure would require an ultrasound test for any woman seeking to terminate a pregnancy, and forbid abortion if the test detects embryonic pulsing.

Someone should drive a stake through the New York Times’ organ of pulsing and then through their embryonic organ of moral reasoning.

One mother’s embryonic moral reasoning is evident in a PBS documentary on abortion in which she is seen starting the chemical abortion of her twins. But first some euphemistic language from the abortionist who says, “This is the mifepristone that will stop the pregnancy from growing…”

A pregnancy (also known as gestation) doesn’t grow. Humans grow.

The doctor then explains that the second medication will help the mother’s body “push the pregnancy tissue out of her uterus.” She won’t even say fetus—let alone baby. I wonder, when she enters delivery rooms at the moment of delivery, does she say, “Okay, mom, push that pregnancy tissue out of your uterus.”

Finally, hear the empty and chilling words of the mother, spoken about and to the twins she’s  aborting:

What I hope I feel is a sense of peace, not only with myself and the decision that I’ve made but also of a sense of peace with these two beings that I’ve chosen not to bring into the world.

Thank you for choosing me. And I’m honored to be given this gift of life. And also, I can’t do it right now.

Can’t? Or Won’t?

Soul-sickening, dishonest rhetoric.

Listen to this article read by Laurie:

https://staging.illinoisfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Torturing-Language-to-Kill-Humans.mp3

A bold voice for pro-family values in Illinois!

Click HERE to learn about supporting IFI on a monthly basis.