Fifteen years ago, the speech U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr recently delivered to students at the University of Notre Dame would have been widely approved. Today, however, the culture has changed so dramatically that widely accepted moral truths are now controversial.

Barr shared his thoughts on religious liberty with students at the Notre Dame Law School and the de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture in early October. He outlined how the Founding Fathers enshrined in the Constitution their belief in the importance of religious liberty, “which provides for limited government, while leaving ‘the People’ broadly at liberty to pursue our lives both as individuals and through free associations.”

In the last century, Barr noted, our beliefs helped us to stand up to and defeat Fascism and Communism. But in this century, we face a different challenge. Barr said the Founding Fathers foresaw “our supreme test as a free society” as a challenge not from without, but from within. “The question,” Barr said, “was whether the citizens in such a free society could maintain the moral discipline and virtue necessary for the survival of free institutions.” We have yet to prove we can meet that test.

Barr said, “Men are subject to powerful passions and appetites, and, if unrestrained, are capable of ruthlessly riding roughshod over their neighbors and the community at large.” The Founders understood these passions and appetites could take different paths, always leading to tyranny.

Barr reminded his audience that “in the Framers’ view, free government was only suitable and sustainable for a religious people–a people who recognized that there was a transcendent moral order antecedent to both the state and man-made law and who had the discipline to control themselves according to those enduring principles.”

This raises the question, what happens when a free republic is no longer governed by a religious people?

Barr discussed how religion promotes the moral discipline and virtue needed to support free government. He said the Founder’s Judeo-Christian moral system taught them, “Moral precepts start with the two great commandments–to Love God with your whole heart, soul, and mind; and to Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself.”

Barr shared that “Natural law–a real, transcendent moral order which flows from God’s eternal law–the divine wisdom by which the whole of creation is ordered.” Today he said, “Modern secularists dismiss this idea of morality as other-worldly superstition imposed by a kill-joy clergy.”

He noted that as the Judeo-Christian moral system has fallen into public disfavor and secularism and the doctrine of moral relativism has grown, our society has seen great upheaval.

Barr cited these statistics:

• In 1965, the illegitimacy rate was 8 percent. In 1992, it was 25 percent. Today, it’s over 40 percent. In many large urban areas, it’s around 70 percent.

• Over 70,000 people die a year from drug overdoses. That’s more than the number who died in the entire Vietnam war.

• There are now record levels of depression, mental illness, and suicides.

He lamented what has happened to our society saying, “What we call ‘values’ today are really nothing more than mere sentimentality, still drawing on the vapor trails of Christianity.”

Barr decried, “The force, fervor, and comprehensiveness of the assault on religion we are experiencing today.” He also noted the irony that the secularism coming against Christianity is becoming a religion unto itself.

We are different from previous societies. Barr said that in the past, the moral chaos we are experiencing now would have caused society to recoil in horror, but today’s high-tech pop culture distracts us from these cultural horrors.

Barr pointed out the absurdity of today’s culture, relying not on morals to treat the underlying cause, but instead on the state. “So, the reaction to growing illegitimacy is not sexual responsibility, but abortion. The reaction to drug addiction is safe injection sites.” The state becomes the father and mother.

Barr criticized, “the way law is being used as a battering ram to break down traditional moral values and to establish moral relativism as a new orthodoxy.” He shared that this has allowed secularists to legalize abortion and euthanasia, and seek to eliminate laws reflecting traditional morality.

He also criticized the Obama administration for refusing to accommodate the free exercise of religion by forcing religious employers to violate their beliefs and provide coverage for abortions and abortifacients.

But he calls public schools “ground zero” for attacks on religious liberty. He sees secularists attacking religious freedom on three fronts:

1.) Public school curricula–often with no opt-out–that are incompatible with traditional religious principles.

2.) Attacks on private religious school that seek to force schools to adhere to secular orthodoxy. He spoke about a lawsuit in Indiana where a teacher is suing a Catholic school because she was fired after revealing she is in a same-sex “marriage.”

3.) Funding for religious schools that is inequitable and unequal. Generally available funds are not available to religious schools. For example, scholarship/savings programs are available only to public school students.

Barr painted a grim picture. “We cannot have a moral renaissance unless we succeed in passing to the next generation our faith and values in full vigor,” he urged. “The times are hostile to this. Public agencies, including public schools, are becoming secularized and increasingly are actively promoting moral relativism.”

In the face of this hostility, Barr offered this advice to students: “We must be vigilant to resist efforts by the forces of secularization to drive religious viewpoints from the public square and to impinge upon the free exercise of our faith.”

Most importantly–and controversially to some–he concluded with this declaration: “I can assure you that, as long as I am Attorney General, the Department of Justice will be at the forefront of this effort, ready to fight for the most cherished of our liberties: the freedom to live according to our faith.”

IFI highly recommends watching his presentation in this YouTube video. His remarks about religious liberty begin at the 12:44 mark:

---

---

A Night With Rev. Franklin Graham!
At this year’s annual IFI banquet, our keynote speaker will be none other than Rev. Franklin Graham, President & CEO of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and Christian evangelist & missionary. This year’s event will be at the Tinley Park Convention Center on Nov. 1st. You don’t want to miss this special evening!

Learn more HERE.

Written by Dr. Daniel Boland, Ph.D.

Dear Bishop Daniel R. Jenky
Rev. John I. Jenkins:

The Laetare Medal is awarded each year to American Catholics “whose genius has ennobled the arts and sciences, illustrated the ideals of the Church and enriched the heritage of humanity.” This year, one of the two recipients was Vice President Joe Biden. With your award of the Laetare Medal to Mr. Biden, I am once again stunned that you choose to celebrate a politically influential person known for his ability to make moral compromises which abet the ongoing destruction of millions of children. I had hoped once was sufficient.

By your entirely unnecessary action, you again disappoint and darken the hopes of many Catholics that you would finally raise the official voice of the University of Notre Dame and take a public stand for the simple message of loving and protecting all God’s children, including the unborn.

I am—once again—stunned at your willingness to downplay Catholic teaching about the sanctity and dignity of human life so that you may give an award to a politically prominent abortion supporter who readily admits that human life begins at conception and who yet does nothing in his considerable power to protect the innocent or speak against abortion.

As Catholic priests and leaders in the Catholic educational community, how could you possibly implement such a morally contradictory decision?

Perhaps your awarding the medal to Mr. Biden seems a smart political move, as it did when you so graced Mr. Obama. But, with many other Catholics and graduates of Notre Dame, I am, once again, astounded that you—priests ordained to model Christ and to give example of moral courage and fidelity—deliberately and gratuitously choose to celebrate Mr. Biden who, along with the party he leads, has for decades supported the destruction of children despite his admission that the unborn are in fact human beings.

I am, once again, appalled that the messages of abortion’s profound moral evil which Mr. Biden and his cohort have for years furthered are of no primary significance or overriding consequence to you. Your decision sends the message of moral indifference to this sick culture in which we live: a culture into which you should, as Catholic priests and leaders, project constant Catholic moral witness concerning above all else the Church’s profound respect for life.

Surely by now you must realize the harm you do to the unity and stability of the Church’s teaching, to the moral fabric of our country and to the reputation of the University as a once-Catholic institution.

Moreover, one might ask what moral example and insight do you offer students by celebrating the ability to make grave moral compromises? By celebrating this powerful politician who admits that abortion kills living children and then admittedly does nothing, do you deepen your students’ belief in the value and applicability of Catholic moral principles? Are Notre Dame students more intelligent Catholics as a result of your celebrating Mr. Biden’s grave moral avoidance? Is this the sort of “compromise” you find so worthy of Notre Dame’s acclaim? Is Mr. Biden the finest Catholic moral exemplar you can find in our society?

One cannot help but wonder why you did not take this opportunity to act in favor of the unborn, in favor of the children. By your celebration of such a moral compromiser, you ignore the profound harm to the unborn which an award from the University of Notre Dame fosters, both in the minds of those who favor abortion (such as Mr. Obama) and in the minds of so many countless citizens whose hapless moral judgments very often depend heavily on the example of those they see as “leaders.”

Incredibly, you have chosen to willingly ignore an opportunity to celebrate someone such as Joe Scheidler, an outstanding Notre Dame graduate who has—at extraordinary cost to himself for decades—revered human life, as the Church teaches and as Notre Dame used to stand for.

By this latest action, you sadly reduce your own moral credibility and significantly tarnish the original meaning of the Laetare Medal. You also cast a dark shadow over the practical wisdom and moral common sense of those who now award it.

God help the Church to overcome the message of moral indifference that your actions convey.