1

Ignoring Evil

The problem of child sexual abuse in the United States is far greater than most people realize. Sixty million American adults are sexual abuse survivors. Twenty percent of us. Thirty-nine million of the victims were abused before turning twelve years old. Because most of them will never tell anyone about their experiences, the scope of the problem remains largely a hidden evil.

One in four girls and one in six boys are sexually abused before reaching eighteen.

Why is so little being done to stop it?

During the 70’s and early 80’s I worked for the Illinois Legislative Investigating Commission, eventually becoming the Chief Investigator. More commonly known as the Illinois Crime Investigating Commission, the agency was created to attack organized crime and official misconduct. Because of that focus, we were directed to investigate the rising instances of child pornography and child prostitution that we were seeing throughout the country.

It was well known that vice activities were dominated by organized crime. So it stood to reason that the outfit was responsible for sexually exploiting growing numbers of children as well. That theory proved to be untrue.

Ninety percent of abuse victims are abused by someone they know. Sixty percent are abused by a family member. Almost twelve percent of students who graduate from high school are victims of educator sexual misconduct sometime between kindergarten and twelfth grade. The mob was not behind it.

The sexual exploitation of children turned out to be something beyond what anybody thought.

Our investigation uncovered a range of horrors none of our investigators ever expected and it led to an almost eight-year investigation into every aspect of the issue—the victims, the families, the perpetrators, the social service agencies, the health workers, the police and detectives, the prosecutors, the entire judicial system. It was all a mess. Nothing worked smoothly. There was little or no cooperation or coordination between and among agencies. Every facet of the system was riddled with incompetence and indifference.

There is no easy solution.

We contacted every police department in the state and interviewed scores of detectives about sex abuse cases they handled. What became very clear immediately was most detectives did not like being assigned these cases. A downstate detective told me one time he heard over the radio the call come in about a child being sexually abused. Immediately, he said, he hid under his desk until the supervisor assigned it to someone else.

The cases were depressing, even more so than homicides. And because the conviction rates were so poor and because they sometimes involved prominent people in the community, they were seen as career killers. Today, these cases generally are handled by specialists. But there are not enough of them.

As a way to improve the overall system, we drafted the initial enabling legislation for what has now become known as the Child Advocacy Centers. There were none back then. Today there are over 800 around the country and, for a time, they were performing a coordinating function that was very effective. Based on indicators I’ve seen recently, I am not sure that is true anymore. In Illinois they seemed to have lost touch with the original intended purpose. I have seen a similar erosion of purpose in other states as well.

During the 70’s, prosecutors were reluctant to take on cases involving child sexual abuse because convictions were hard to get. That remains the situation today. Prosecutors often take plea deals that don’t involve the perpetrator admitting to a sex offense. Or, they agree to a less serious offense that has less jail time.

Social workers for DCFS and contract agencies remain ill equipped to handle any serious cases as they remain hamstrung by rules that prevent adequate triaging of the caseload. Often, then and now, they will spend more time on easy cases where parents and caretakers are cooperative, than they will on much more serious cases where the parents actively resist and evade the caseworkers.

You would think that at least the health care workers would be universally committed to the protection of children. Not always. They generally are pretty good at reporting suspected cases of abuse, at least physical abuse. But underage girls who are pregnant sometimes are not reported as victims of abuse, despite the prima facia evidence that the child was sexually abused. Children legally cannot give consent.

In some cases, health workers help arrange, or provide, abortions without notifying the police, DCFS or any other official.

This is also sometimes true when there is evidence boys have been sexually abused, and the boys refuse to cooperate.

No report.

When a case overcomes all the hurdles, and the prosecutor secures a conviction, there is no guarantee justice will be served. Too often, judges minimize the sentencing.

Recently, a teacher in Michigan engaged in sexual intercourse repeatedly over several months with her 13-year-old student. She was convicted of multiple counts of first-degree and third-degree criminal sexual conduct, for which she could have received life imprisonment. She was sentenced to 3 to 20 years. Period. She probably will be out much earlier. She’s not the only one. It’s the same as it was 50 years ago.

In the 70’s, one of our first cases involved a man who was sexually abusing a girl for three years, starting when she was 6. We got him cold on child pornography charges and he gave a full confession. He was sentenced to five years.

Pathetic.

Those immersed in the system know all this is true, but for one reason or another are not inclined to do anything about it. Those outside the system are largely oblivious, and very often want to remain ignorant.

This leaves our next generation condemned to evade the predators as best they can largely on their own. The consequences? More and more children will become victims of child sexual abuse. In thirty years maybe there will be 90 million adult survivors. By then, twenty five percent of us?

Unless we step up and start doing something much more effective, the numbers are going to keep growing.

(Next time, some things that are working and what you can do.)





Abortion and States’ Rights

On May 2, the town of Danville, Illinois became what some have called a “sanctuary city for the unborn.” After Planned Parenthood staff announced plans to open an abortion clinic in the town, the city council reacted by narrowly passing an ordinance (8-7), citing a section of federal law that forbids the mailing of abortion paraphernalia.

Danville’s recent ordinance does not quite make it a “sanctuary city”—at least not in the same sense that Seattle is a “sanctuary” for illegal immigrants on the run from federal immigration officials. Danville’s ordinance is actually a reverse “sanctuary” provision that enforces federal authority in the township, in the face of state law. And herein lies the convoluted back-and-forth of legal argumentation, as both the pro-life and the pro-choice movements have exposited the law to support their side.

The pro-life ordinance makes a clear-cut appeal to the U.S. Constitution, citing Article VI which makes all federal laws the “supreme Law of the Land.” The ordinance further references a section of federal law, U.S.C. §§ 1461–62, which prohibits using the mail system to deliver abortion paraphernalia. Thus, the ordinance explains, since 1) the Danville City Council is “bound by oath to support and defend the Constitution,” 2) the Constitution makes federal law the supreme law of the land, and 3) federal law prohibits mailing abortifacients, therefore Danville is upholding the Constitution in passing this restriction.

The pro-abortion-rights side is not backing down easily, however. According to Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Danville’s new rule violates Illinois state law. The state’s Reproductive Health Act prohibits local governments from restricting abortion rights tighter than the state law does, so he claims that Danville simply lacks the legal authority to pass such a regulation.

This article is not intended to endorse or refute either legal argument. Either way it turns out in court, the pro-life movement can still learn a valuable lesson from the Danville controversy.

Roe didn’t get rid of abortion—it made the national discussion that much more tangled.

Pro-lifers cheered as Dobbs struck down the blanket national ruling which said “the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.” Immediately, state governors and legislators went to work to pass pro-life or pro-abortion laws, depending on the state.

I’m sure some of us, cheering for Dobbs, were tempted to view ourselves as the reasonable states-rights defenders, in opposition to those big, bad authoritarian federal mandates and rulings. But being “pro-states-rights” really only truly works for the pro-life cause when the state you live in is already pro-life. In states like Illinois, being “pro-states-rights” actually seems to be more like being “pro-choice,” at least in the Danville case.

So states’ rights is not our savior, if it ever was. Don’t get me wrong—it’s a worthy principle, enshrined in our nation’s founding, and one that works well for our side in many places, especially right when the Dobbs ruling came down and various states started banning abortion right and left. But those states only did so because they were already pro-life. The cultural and political groundwork was already in place. In states where these prerequisites are not already in place, “states rights” is just a further justification to keep and expand the abortion restrictions they believe in.

Dobbs was not the end of the pro-life fight. It just moved the battle to a different battlefield, one that is currently focused more on individual skirmishes in particular states than mass movements of troops on the national stage. The dispute over Danville’s ordinance shows us much more clearly how important the local cultural battle is. Overturning U.S. Supreme Court precedent is a major step, but it was only the first step.

Influencing culture and educating the populace who will in turn vote for next year’s lawmakers is the way to ensure the breakthrough we won with Dobbs will actually bring pro-life wins to our states’ laws.

When it comes to the abortion debate, our local neighborhoods are now the new Supreme Court chamber.





“There are two genders! Period.”

It doesn’t get any better (or worse) than this. Illinois State Senator Andrew Chesney (R-Freeport) forcefully addressed 58 elected adults in a chamber on an obvious fact that no one else would address: there are only two genders – male and female.  He went on record, speaking directly to the Progressives on the Senate floor, in his powerful short speech against HB 2350, a bill to mandate that insurance companies now cover Pap smear tests for men and prostate exams for women.

Yes, conservative senators and representatives have long railed outside the chamber on this. And they have politely pointed out in committee and on the floor the obvious flaws and craziness in gender-related bills like HB 1596 (deleting children’s pronouns from law), and others. But this was the first time in memory someone eloquently, fiercely, and simply spoke to a chamber the objective Truth of male and female. Sure, it would have been great to hear God referenced, but it was a great speech nonetheless.

Transcript:

“It’s precisely about feelings. Folks, if you want to know why kids are confused and why people do crazy stuff, this is exactly why. Biological males cannot get pap smears. It’s not possible! It’s physically and anatomically impossible. It’s not even…it’s not even following science! You know, people don’t understand why we do goofball things – this is why. Right? Biological women cannot go get a prostrate exam. It’s not possible!

“So we can do all the gender feel-good garbage, but this is why our kids are confused. This is why your kids are dressing up as furries and want kitty-litter in the bathroom. It’s because you guys won’t follow science! There are two genders! There are two genders possible; there’s not three, there’s not four, there’s two! The crazy stuff like this is why people are confused, and the kids don’t know what the hell’s going on because they’re confused because of legislation like this.

“Drop the pronoun crap. There are two genders! Period.”

Kudos to Senator Chesney for speaking out! Wouldn’t it be great if more Christian conservative lawmakers would refuse to remain silent in the face of super-majority tyranny?

Left-leaning lawmakers sat stunned that someone would question what they thought was now accepted  – that gender is fluid and changeable. It was as if they were frozen. They just sat silent and motionless. Whereas moderate and conservative legislators stayed composed, most of them enthusiastically enjoyed his speech as Chesney spoke the truth. Many couldn’t believe Sen. Chesney was actually driving the point directly home. And a lot of them, I’m sure, wished they could have had the courage to say what he said on the Senate floor.

It did take courage. One wouldn’t think so, but today it takes great courage for an elected official, especially in Illinois, to speak the truth to the supermajority in power in Illinois.  And there are a handful of other legislators in Springfield who, thank God, have spoken the truth on marriage, homosexuality, life, etc., don’t get me wrong. The media does cover them very well when they come across badly in tone or substance — they just don’t cover them when they do it effectively. (In fact, just the other day, Sen. Jil Tracy and Sen. Terri Bryant said on the Senate floor they were “offended” as mothers that legislation would actually cancel the term “mother” in Illinois statute.)

Just like the vast majority of Illinois voters, these citizen legislators work and live in the real world. They know the vast majority are not demanding woke polices that neuter pronouns or create co-ed bathrooms. One Pew Research poll suggests that 60% believe that gender is determined by sex at birth. Yes, I know that sounds low, but that number is even growing in our confused society.

Sen. Chesney will be attacked by the media and by the supermajority party. They will claim he’s being uncompassionate, a liar, and/or a fanatic. What little legislation the supermajority was allowing Sen. Chesney to pass to benefit his constituents may not be as likely to pass now. He will be reprimanded for calling out those in power. His friends and colleagues on the GOP side will tell him privately how much they truly appreciated his remarks, but publicly will these friends and colleagues try to distance themselves from him? We sure hope not.

Such is the place we’re in – where the majority of Illinoisans still sit on the sidelines just like most legislators. But some are coming out of the woodwork, like Chesney. I am hopeful that his speech emboldened the GOP at least for the remaining days of session. We should pray to that end.

Take ACTION: Please take a few minutes of your time to thank Sen. Chesney by calling his Springfield office (217-782-0180) and/or his Freeport district office (815-232-0774).  The LEAST we can do is thank him as he takes the slings and arrows from woke activists and the legacy media.

It is hard to believe that the Illinois House passed this by a vote of 78 to 32 and the Illinois Senate passed it by a vote of 37 to 17. Governor JB Pritzker is expected to sign this bill into law when he receives it in the near future.

More ACTION: Please consider calling the Governor’s office in Springfield at (217) 782-6830 or his office in Chicago at (312) 814-2121 to express your opposition to this mandate requiring health insurance coverage of Pap smear tests and prostate screenings for all (HB 2350). You may want to let him know that biological men do not need Pap smear tests and biological women do not need prostate exams.





Three Weeks to Stop These Bills!

In three weeks our state lawmakers will adjourn, if they follow their published schedule to end session on May 19, 2023. Our lobbyist strongly feels that a flood of phone calls into Springfield offices could be enough to stop efforts to pass these egregious bills.

Click HERE for the Springfield office numbers for your state representative and state senator. Click on the last two at the bottom.

CALL YOUR STATE SENATOR
to oppose the following bills:

HB 1286 legalizes all-gender multiple-occupancy public bathrooms, putting women and girls in danger of voyeurism, sexual assault, or worse. It has already passed in the Illinois House by a partisan vote of 60 to 40 with 1 voting Present. The deadline to be heard in the Illinois Senate Executive Committee was extended to this week. In addition, if you haven’t yet submitted a witness slip in opposition to HB 1286, click HERE.

-Fill out your name, address, email and phone number. Leave everything else blank unless it requires the blank to be filled, then try self, citizen, or voter.
-Highlight “Opponent” and “Record of Appearance Only.”

-Check Terms of Agreement and click Create Slip.

HB 1596 deletes masculine and feminine pronouns in numerous state laws and replaces them with genderless terms. It passed out of the Illinois House and now goes to the full Illinois Senate.

HB 2039 turns over your personal health records to local health departments “for the purposes of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability” and “provides the Department of Public Health, the Department of Human Services, and the Department of Healthcare and Family Services may adopt any rules necessary to implement the Act.” Think lockdowns, vaccine intimidation, and masks. It passed out of the Illinois House and now goes to the full Illinois Senate.

CALL YOUR STATE REPRESENTATIVE
to oppose the following bills:

SB 1909 has been termed the Deceptive Practices of Limited Services Pregnancy Centers Act. Its intention is to shut down pregnancy care centers. It allows the Illinois Attorney General to investigate and take action in response to any complaint against a pregnancy care center for alleged

“deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, or misrepresentation, or the concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact, with the intent that others rely upon the concealment, suppression or omission of such material fact: to interfere with an individual seeking to gain entry or access to a provider of abortion or emergency contraception…”

Imagine the pro-abortion activists getting in line to file phony complaints. It passed out of the Illinois Senate and now goes to the full Illinois House.

SB 1344 mandates abortifacient and hormonal therapy coverage for transgenders in all Illinois insurance policies. Your premiums will be paying for these. It passed out of the Illinois Senate and now goes to the full Illinois House.





Co-Ed Bathrooms Put Women & Girls in Danger

One would think that our female lawmakers would be advocates for other females. It’s simply common sense. Unfortunately, common sense is a rare commodity in the halls of the State Capitol these days.

State Representative Katie Stuart (D-Collinsville) and State Senator Celina Villanueva (D-Chicago) are the chief sponsors of HB 1286, which legalizes all-gender multiple-occupancy public bathrooms. It has already passed in the Illinois House by a partisan vote of 60 to 40 with 1 voting Present.

It must be their intention to make Illinois as “progressive” as California. They obviously understand that to legalize all-gender multiple-occupancy public bathrooms would place vulnerable women and girls at risk of sexual assault and voyeurism. What in the world are Stuart, Villanueva and the other 59 who voted to support it in the Illinois House thinking? There’s no question that lawmakers who voted in favor of HB 1286 have labeled themselves as anti-woman. It would be wise for state senators to consider that.

Allowing men and women to share multiple-occupancy bathrooms has always been illegal and should remain so. These private single-gender spaces should be kept safe so that all persons can take care of personal hygiene matters without fearing for their physical safety. Putting all female citizens at risk of sexual assault or worse is a foolish undertaking. Click HERE to read about assaults that have already been taking place in bathrooms as a result of such “progressive” laws.

TAKE ACTION: CLICK HERE to file a witness slip in opposition to HB 1286. Then click HERE to email your state senator urging him/her to oppose HB 1286 should it pass out of committee. HB 1286 will be heard in the Senate Executive Committee on Wednesday, April 26th at 1:30 PM.

-Fill out your name, address, email and phone number. Leave everything else blank unless it requires the blank to be filled, then try self, citizen, or voter.-Highlight “Opponent” and “Record of Appearance Only.”
-Check Terms of Agreement and click Create Slip.

PLEASE TAKE ACTION ON THESE OTHER BILLS

SB 1909 aims to shut down pregnancy care centers. It allows the Attorney General to investigate and take action in response to any complaint against a pregnancy care center for alleged “deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, or misrepresentation, or the concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact, with the intent that others rely upon the concealment, suppression or omission of such material fact: to interfere with an individual seeking to gain entry or access to a provider of abortion or emergency contraception…” SB 1909 has already passed in the State Senate by a vote of 36 to 19.

Click HERE to file a witness slip in opposition to SB 1909. The bill is scheduled to be heard in the House Healthcare Availability and Accessibility Committee on Tuesday, April 25th at 1:30 p.m.

HB 2039 will allow your personal health records to be given to local health departments “for the purposes of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability” and “provides the Department of Public Health, the Department of Human Services, and the Department of Healthcare and Family Services may adopt any rules necessary to implement the Act.” Think lockdowns, vaccine intimidation, and masks. HB 2039 has already passed in the House by a vote of 81 to 27!

Click HERE to file a witness slip in opposition to HB 2039. This bill is scheduled to be heard in the Senate Public Health Committee on Tuesday, April 25th at 1:30 p.m.

SB 1344 mandates that insurance companies cover abortion drugs and hormonal therapy for transgenderism. If this becomes law, your premiums will be helping to provide these immoral drug therapies for others. SB 1344 has already passed in the Senate by a vote of 36 to 19.

Click HERE to file a witness slip in opposition to SB 1344. The bill is scheduled to be heard in the House Prescription Drug Affordability and Accessibility Committee at on Wednesday, April 26th at 4 p.m.

HB 1596 deletes masculine and feminine pronouns in numerous state laws and replaces them with genderless terms, furthering “progressives'” intention to eliminate the differences between the 2 genders. This bill has passed in the House by a vote of 72 to 37.

Click HERE to file a witness slip in opposition to HB 1596. The bill is scheduled to be heard in the Senate Human Rights Committee on Thursday, April 27th at 9:30 a.m.

THANK YOU FOR TAKING ACTION ON THESE BILLS!





No Common Sense

Schools throughout Illinois have implemented rules that require students to be allowed to use the restrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity, but it is not clear exactly how many schools. So a trans boy, who is really a girl, is allowed to use the boys’ restroom and locker room. While a trans girl, who is really a boy, is allowed to use the girls’ facilities. The requirement is based on a guidance document from the Illinois State Board of Education.

The guidance document claims that the Illinois Human Rights Act requires schools to allow trans students to use the facilities based on their claimed identity.  The document points out the law specifically states “transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming students have the right to use a school’s physical facilities consistent with their gender identity.” The general public is largely unaware of this legislation.

There are a couple of problems with this law, not the least of which is that there is no such thing as gender identity. That term is based on a fraudulent theory proposed in the 50’s by John Money. He theorized that our gender identity could be different than our biological sex, that it was independent and fluid. It remained a theory until he was given the opportunity to test it out on the Reimer twins. One twin, Bruce, had his penis catastrophically damaged by a horribly botched circumcision as an infant. His entire penis was burned off due to medical incompetence. The parents refused the procedure for the other twin.

Sometime later, the parents reached out to Dr. John Money, a psychologist from Johns Hopkins University, who had put forward the theory that any child born a boy could be raised as a girl, or vice versa. Nurture, not nature, determined a child’s gender identity, he claimed, and he convinced the parents that Bruce could have a normal life as a girl. Money enthusiastically took on the case and treated the boys for several years. He began writing articles about the case, underscoring how well the children were doing, pointing out that Bruce, being raised as a girl, had taken to her identity very well. The success of his experiment received international attention.

The real story was that the experiment was an utter failure. You can read about the case in a book by John Colapinto, “As Nature Made Him.” The bottom line is instead of proving gender identity was real, it proved the opposite. Money never acknowledged the failure and continued to pretend gender identity was real. One of the twins died of a drug overdose and Bruce committed suicide. I would say that was a failure, spectacularly so.

Despite this failure being made public in 2000, the psychological community ignored it. The idea that the theory of gender identity was real took on a life of its own and continued to gain adherents even with no evidence to support it and with two dead boys from the study that was used to confirm the theory. Who needs evidence, right?

Our Illinois State Board of Education and many of our local schools just roll over and conform to the fraud that is gender identity.

Some students at Waterloo High School in Waterloo, Illinois rebelled against this invasion of their privacy. Earlier this year, high school principal, Lori Costello, wife of Illinois Department of Agriculture Director, Jerry Costello II, allowed trans students to use the restroom of their choice.  According to Ryan Cunningham of the nonprofit organization, Speak for Students,” several students at the school identify as trans, boys and girls. Students told him that one of the trans boys (a girl) regularly uses the boys restroom. She reportedly stands at the urinal and uses a funnel which she washes out in the common sink. At least one student claimed that was not true. Whether it is or not, many of the boys were uncomfortable using the restroom with girls being allowed free access to the facility.

The students were told if they felt uncomfortable, they should use the nurse’s restroom which is for one person at a time. On March 17th approximately 150 students lined up to use it. The administration didn’t like that at all.

Brian Charron, the Superintendent of CUSD #5, issued instructions that any student in line who was late to class was to be marked tardy. If the protest continued, he directed that the students be disciplined. Reportedly, some students were. Cunningham said he helped several parents appeal and succeeded in having the discipline withdrawn. He is not sure what happened with the other students. However, to his knowledge the directive stands.

I sent a message to Charron asking the status, but so far have received no response.

The Biden Administration last summer proposed revisions to Title IX regulations which would redefine the meaning of the term “sex” to include gender identity. During the public comment stage over 240,000 comments were received. It is not known whether these comments will affect the final regulations. We will see in May, when the revised regulations are released publicly.

If the rules change the definition of sex to include gender identity, it is unlikely they will withstand a challenge which most certainly will be filed immediately. In West Virginia v. EPA the U.S. Supreme Court decided last summer that:

“Precedent teaches that there are ‘extraordinary cases’ in which the ‘history and the breadth of the authority that [the agency] has asserted,’ and the ‘economic and political significance’ of that assertion, provide a ‘reason to hesitate before concluding that Congress’ meant to confer such authority.”

In the case of redefining sex in Title IX to mean “gender identity,” Congress could not possibly have intended to give the Department of Education the power to redefine a foundational characteristic of all humanity since the dawn of time. This is exactly the same reasoning that the Illinois Human Rights Act is flawed.

Another case, in November last year, in Neese v. Becerra, a U.S. District court ruled that sex did not equal sexual orientation or gender identity. And in December, the 11th Circuit Appellate Court ruled in Adams v. St. Johns County School Board that a school board policy requiring students to use the bathroom that corresponded to their biological sex did not violate Title IX.

Since the idea of “gender identity” emanated from the deranged mind of John Money, and has no science that supports the alleged identities, the most prudent course for all school boards would be to reject the guidance on this issue from the Illinois State Board of Education.

One stumbling block for school boards could be the lawyers they are selecting to advise them. It seems many lawyers are advising boards to cave to the guidance. Apparently, they are too timid to challenge the misguided Illinois Human Rights Act. That is a mistake. While it may save the boards money in the short term, in the long run these misguided rules are going to destroy the schools.

School boards, when choosing lawyers to advise them, would be better off if they followed J.P. Morgan’s philosophy. Reportedly, his position was: “I don’t hire a lawyer to tell me what I can’t do, I hire a lawyer to tell me how to do what I want to do.”

In this case school boards need lawyers who can tell them how to implement policies that align with common sense. Obviously, Waterloo High School does not have such a lawyer. It’s a quality that appears to be lacking in the school leadership and in the district administration as well.

Time to clean house.



Get your children & grandchildren OUT of government schools as soon as possible!




California Dreaming?

Is it possible that our legislators are trying their best to make Illinois the California of the Midwest, without the mountains or beautiful weather? Our Governors, most certainly, are competing. Both have wildly inflated egos, both ignored their own directives during the height of the pandemic, and both have designs on the White House.

We already have many other similarities as well. Our largest cities are infested with crime and plagued with Soros backed prosecutors. English language and math proficiency for all students also is bleak for both states, although Illinois is worse. California is 50% and 34%, while in Illinois it is 29.9% and 25.8% for English and Math. And both states are losing population in record numbers. The 2020 figures show California losing 182,000 of its population of 39.5 million and Illinois has dropped 104,000 of its 12.5 million total population.

Instead of addressing these and other serious issues, our august lawmakers are trying to stay neck and neck with the Golden State on woke bathroom policies. Our General Assembly just passed an amendment (HB 1286) to the “Equitable Restroom Act,” that allows that “[a]ny multiple-occupancy restroom may be converted into an all-gender multiple-occupancy restroom.” It goes on to describe a variety of requirements for partitioned stalls and urinals. It was passed by a vote of 60 to 40, all Republicans voting against it.

Why?

California passed a similar bill that was signed into law by Newsom last year. The reasoning for the legislation was thin. One explanation was that parents could take their opposite sex minor child into the restroom with them . . . But, wait. Hasn’t that already been going on everywhere, forever?

Then there was the explanation that it allowed for more equitable gender inclusion. Isn’t that a separate argument? Haven’t we already been fighting that issue as it relates to gender identity, allowing people to use the restroom of the sex they identify with rather than their biological sex? I guess it answers the problem of the non-binary. If you don’t identify with either sex, where do you go? Literally, where do you go? Voila, an all-gender restroom.

Some pundits claim that the sex separated restroom prudery didn’t begin until the Victorian era, although many also mention that Paris began using separate public restrooms in the 1700’s.  What nobody mentioned is that throughout most of the world there were no public facilities other than outhouses, alleys and the great outdoors. Ancient Rome had public toilets, but I could not find any definitive source that could say one way or the other if facilities were separate for men and women. Logic indicates they were, since Roman baths were used by men and women, but there were separate designated times for men and for women to use them. Even in Rome, modesty prevailed.

Harvard Law Professor and columnist for the New Yorker, Jeannie Suk Gersen, has a more practical reason for combined restrooms. Saving time. In an article she wrote in 2016, Gersen recounted the occasion when she took the bar exam at the Jacob Javits Center in New York. She had to go to the restroom, but the ladies room had an “enormous line.” Instead of waiting, she walked into the men’s room, where there was no line, used one of the many empty stalls and expeditiously returned to successfully complete her exam. It wasn’t fair, according to Gerson, that the women had a long line while the men had none. So, she corrected the injustice. Professor Gerson observes:

Today, men and women, not assumed to be only heterosexual, are expected to function at work alongside one another, eat at adjacent seats in restaurants, sit cheek by jowl in buses and airplanes, take classes, study in libraries, and, with some exceptions, even pray together. Why is the multi-stall bathroom the last public vestige of gendered social separation? When men, gay or straight, can stand shoulder to shoulder at urinals without a second thought, is there much to back up the view that men and women must not pee or poop next to one another, especially if closed stalls would shield them from view?

Does modesty have no value, privacy and safety no utility, professor?

Why are our legislators devoting time on such issues as this? Is this really something that a majority of Illinoisans want? An identical bill was passed 63-43 in the Illinois House in 2021, but was not voted on in the Senate. Why bring it up again? Why do people with such strange priorities keep getting elected? And why is this a political issue?

Take ACTION: Click HERE to send a message to your local state senator to ask him/her to vote against this legislation when it comes up for a vote on the Senate floor sometime this session. Urge them to reject this foolish woke agenda that fails to recognize biological facts. Ask them to protect the privacy, dignity and safety of all Illinois citizens.

Please, speak out against this destructive bill.





U.S. Representative Mary Miller’s Congressional Family Caucus

Most of what you read in the news (and, to be frank, most of what we at IFI report in our daily articles) focuses on things the writer thinks are wrong with the world. That’s certainly a vital function of journalism. All the same, it’s definitely a blessing when a journalist gets to report on something God-honoring happening in the world.

Earlier this month, U.S. Representative Mary Miller (R-Lincoln) announced the launch of the Congressional Family Caucus from the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. In a brief but spirited speech, she explained that the caucus’ purpose is to defend the natural family from Left-grounded erosion. She subsequently criticized the Left for its support of “abortion, fatherlessness, surgical castration, and atheism,” as well as “eliminating parental consent and replacing families with the state.”

As the Congresswoman laid out the stakes in the battle over the family, she was firmly clear both about what the family is and about why the family matters. The “natural family,” as she put it, is “a man and a woman committed for life to each other and to their children,” and is fundamental for our nation’s prosperity as it is “the root of self-government, service, community, and personal responsibility.” To top it all off, she cited Deuteronomy 6 to justify why the family ought to be the hub of instructing our children to love and obey God, then she contended that U.S. Representatives have a moral obligation to protect the family. The caucus is co-sponsored by U.S. Representatives Diana Harshbarger (R-TN) and Brian Babin (R-TX).

And all from the floor of the House of Representatives. That Mrs. Miller had the boldness to call out the importance of the family was one thing, but to chastise the Left for their relentless undermining, to unequivocally define the traditional family contrary to the torrent of popular opinion, and to cite Scripture as support for her initiative, all deserve a standing ovation.

In an interview with Tony Perkins, Miller explained her and her co-sponsors’ efforts more specifically. The caucus’ purpose is to inform legislators about upcoming bills that would promote or tear down the traditional family. This would not only include legislation that is directly aimed at the family, but also bills that might have a completely different surface-level purpose—such as bills pertaining to the economy—but which have family-impacting implications. Miller again emphasized that God’s command about the instruction of children was given to parents, not to the government. And when Perkins asked her how she could use prayer, Miller referenced Psalm 18’s emphasis on the importance of words and asked for prayer for words that would be used to build people up. Let’s pray that the Lord continues to give Miller boldness to speak the firm and simple truth to a world that is blazing with lies.

Speaking of which, although Representative Miller said that the caucus has been met with a great deal of support, not everyone is thrilled about the new show in town. An article in the American Independent warned about the “new anti-LGBTQ Congressional Family Caucus, “lumping it together with recent GOP-sponsored bills addressing transgender bathrooms, locker rooms, and military service as yet another attack on the transgender community. We can only expect that the more effective the caucus becomes, the more fire it will draw from those who reject traditional, scriptural morality and seek to erode it. If you live in Illinois, but especially if you live in Legislative District 15, send Representative Miller an encouraging letter right now.





Illinois State Lawmaker Wants to Usurp Parental Authority

An interesting discussion between Dan Proft (Chicago’s Morning Answer AM 560) and State Representative LaShawn Ford (D-Chicago) about his parental bullying bill, HB 29. The bill’s synopsis states that a parent commits “parental bullying” “when he or she knowingly and with the intent to discipline, embarrass, or alter the behavior of the minor, transmits any verbal or visual message that the parent or legal guardian reasonably believes would coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to the minor.”

From the bill:

A parent or legal guardian of a minor commits parental bullying when he or she knowingly and with the intent to discipline, embarrass, or alter the behavior of the minor, transmits any verbal or visual message that the parent or legal guardian reasonably believes would coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to the minor.

It’s beyond understanding that lawmakers are now attempting to put an end to a parent’s role to attempt to change bad behavior in their child. If that’s not ridiculous enough, if found guilty, a fine could be imposed upon the parent that would be held in escrow and given to the minor when he/she turned 18.

Talk about an incentive for kids to take their parents to court for doing their job!

Watch this interview session as Chicago’s Morning Answer radio host Dan Proft interviews the sponsor of this terrible proposal and please share it on your social media platforms!





Urgent Calls Needed to Lawmakers on 3 Bills

Thank you for filing witness slips and emailing your lawmakers on the barrage of bills we have been asking you to take action on. We believe they have made a difference! But we’re far from being out of the woods.

The following 3 bills have passed out of their respective committees and will be heard on the full Illinois House or Illinois Senate floor any day now. Calls into the Springfield offices of your lawmakers would be the ideal way to give them pause before they cast their votes. They must understand that their is significant opposition to their left-wing, big government agenda.

Please CLICK HERE to access your state representative’s and state senator’s Springfield office numbers. You’ll find them at the very end of Your State Officials.

Call the appropriate office for these following 3 bills:

Ask your state rep to oppose HB 2039 which allows for your personal health records to be sent to your local health department “for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease…” and allows the Dept. of Public Health, the Dept. of Human Services, and the Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services to “adopt any rules necessary to implement the Act.” Think lockdowns and masks.

Ask your state rep to oppose HB 1286 which legalizes and allows construction or conversion of “multiple occupancy restrooms” into “all-gender restrooms” complete with urinals, stalls, partitions, and signage so that both sexes may use the same multiple-occupancy restroom at the same time. If you have a wife, daughter, sister, or mother, “all-gender multiple-occupancy” public restrooms puts them at risk of encountering peeping toms and in danger of sexual assault.

Ask your state senator to oppose SB 1344 which mandates that abortion drugs and transgender hormonal therapy treatment be covered in insurance policies.

CLICK HERE for your state representative’s and state senator’s Springfield office phone numbers. Please call them today!

Thank you for doing what you can to stall/stop these bill!





Springfield Legislative Update

The deadline for bills to get a committee hearing was last Friday, March 10th. Unfortunately, several have had their deadlines extended and are listed below. The danger is that some of these are the worse bills and have been given a second chance to be passed.

Abortion Bills

SB 1909 aims to close pregnancy care centers. It allows for the Attorney General to investigate any of a long list of complaints of “deceptive practices.” It allows fines of up to $50,000 to be imposed. The deadline was extended to March 24th.

Please click HERE to email your state senator to oppose SB 1909.

SB 218 allows physician assistants to prescribe Schedule I, II, III, IV, and IV drugs including abortion drugs. No hearing is scheduled, but you can still email your state senator. The deadline was extended to March 24th.

Please click HERE to email your state senator to oppose SB 218.

HB 999 establishes Department of Public Health women’s clinics around the state that will include “birth control services,” which will include abortions. No hearing is scheduled, but you can still email your state senator. The deadline was extended to March 19th.

Please click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 999. (If the system won’t allow you to leave a space blank, type in self, or citizen, or voter, etc.) The bill is scheduled for a hearing on Thursday, March 16 at 8:30 a.m.

SB 1344 passed out of committee and now goes to the Senate floor. SB 1344 mandates abortifacient and gender transition hormonal therapy coverage in all Illinois insurance policies.

Please click HERE to email your state senator to oppose SB 1344.

Your Personal Health Records Made Available

HB 2039 passed out of committee and now goes to the House floor. HB 2039 allows for your personal health records to be sent to your local health department “for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease…” and allows the Dept. of Public Health, the Dept. of Human Services, and the Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services to “adopt any rules necessary to implement the Act.

Please click HERE to email your state representative and urge him/her to oppose HB 2039.

All-Gender Multiple-Occupancy Restrooms Legalized

HB 1286 passed out of committee and now goes to the floor. HB 1286 legalizes and allows construction or conversion of “multiple occupancy restrooms” into “all-gender restrooms” complete with urinals, stalls, partitions, and signage so that both sexes may use the same multiple-occupancy restroom at the same time.

Please click HERE to email your state representative to oppose HB 1286.

Misc. Bills That Have Passed Out of Committee

HB 1596 now goes to the House floor. HB 1596 deletes gender-specific pronouns in numerous laws.

Please click HERE to email your state representative, urging him/her to oppose HB 1596.

HB 3 now goes to the House floor. HB 3 removes from the definition of “neglected child” as one who is born with a controlled substance in their system and removes in law that such a mother is unfit.

Please click HERE to email your state representative, urging him/her to oppose HB 3.

HB 1591 now goes to the House floor. HB 1591 will make Illinois a destination for same-sex couples if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision which struck down state bans on same-sex “marriage.” In that case, many states could opt to ban same-sex “marriage” in their state once again. HB 1591 will repeal three specific statutes in Illinois’ Marriage Law. These sections are the obstacles for same-sex couples residing in another state who want to marry and then go back to their state with a valid “marriage” license.

Please click HERE to email your state representative to oppose HB 1591.

HB 2118 now goes to the House floor. HB 2118 allows any supplier (not just a pharmacy) to sell any amount (rather than a limit of 100) of hypodermic needles to anyone over 18.

Please click HERE to email your state representative to oppose HB 2118.

HB 2572 now goes to the House floor. HB 2572 bans funds from going to any groups that help people struggling with same-sex attraction. Amounts currently owed to any such groups would be cancelled.

Please click HERE to email your state representative to oppose HB  2572.





Politics – A Worldview Apart

For Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, “Turn out the lights, the party’s over.” That’s particularly embarrassing for her because a sitting mayor is supposed to be reelected. She failed to impress voters, yet announced that Chicago moved forward during her term. Voters disagreed. Opponents pointed out the rise in crime and a consistently divisive leadership style.

So who is next up? We find out on April 4th when the top two vote-getters face a runoff election. Paul Vallas positions himself to be somewhat conservative in his approach to government. Brandon Johnson, the more liberal.

Both are experienced in the political arena. Paul Vallas is the former Chicago Public Schools CEO. He finished with almost 34% of the vote. Johnson is a Cook County Commissioner and drew 20.32% of the vote. He found heavy support from the educational community as a Chicago Teachers Union organizer.

Mayor Lightfoot finished third out of nine candidates. She garnered a weak 16.9% of the vote total. Lori was the first black female mayor in Chicago’s history and the first openly “gay” mayor.

Vallas is a family man. Paul and his wife, Sharon, raised three sons: Gus, Mark, and Paul Jr. Two of those men have gone on to public service careers.  The Vallas’s second born, Mark, died as a result of opioid abuse in 2018. Heartbreaking. His faith background is Greek Orthodox.

Brandon Johnson is also a family man. He resides on the west side of Chicago with wife Stacie and three children. He was born in Elgin. Brandon is the son of a pastor and one of ten siblings. It is said he was “raised on a foundation of hard work, faith, and service.” He ran as one of the most “progressive’ candidates on the ballot.

So both men “identify” with faith in the Christian tradition. However, that really does not tell us much. What we really need to know is how their faith shapes their worldview—which gives us a much better picture on how they will pursue political decisions that support (or do not support) healthy families.

For example, during the campaign, Paul Vallas was asked to clarify his views on abortion. To which he replied, “Fundamentally, I oppose abortion.” Then a spokeswoman for Vallas said he was referring to his Greek Orthodox faith, which opposes abortion.

When Vallas last ran for mayor in 2019, this was his posture on LGBTQ issues: “My approach has always been to embrace and support the LGBT community and let my actions speak louder than my words as I fight for rights and services for all Chicagoans.”

Here’s the other choice. On his brandonforchicago.com website, it was said “Brandon will transform Chicago into a national model for gender equity and reproductive rights, champion LGBTQ rights as human rights, and be a visible and vocal ally to creating safety and equal opportunity for the LGBTQ community.” Party line politics.

Same brandonforchicago.com website, this time on abortion. “There are three things I would like to make absolutely clear. One: abortion is health care. Two: abortion should be a constitutional right. Three: We will not accept an America – or a Chicago – that goes back in time. There is no middle ground on abortion.” He’s right on that last part!

Now the true colors are known of the moral positions of the two Chicago mayoral candidates. This defines their worldview. If you ask either candidate if they wish to govern with wisdom, no doubt they both would nod affirmatively. The writer of Proverbs makes it clear, “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, and the knowledge of the Holy One is insight. (Proverbs 9:10, ESV)

Over the course of time in my role in talk radio, I would frequently ask political leaders or candidates this question: “What is your source of moral truth?” Several would stumble through their answer.

An important question, yes? I dare say, a critical question. Because that, in fact, identifies much about their worldview. We should not be afraid to ask our “leaders” (or candidates) about their worldview. Obviously, it will shape their public policy decisions.

What about your worldview? Does it need a tune-up? The Illinois Family Institute offers access to a number of worldview shaping events. There is one coming up on March 18th. You can find details on the IFI Events page.





Co-Ed Restrooms – The Latest in the Culture War

When the Equitable Restrooms bill was introduced in Springfield, a familiar pattern started to emerge. As IFI readers may know, HB 1286 legalizes “all-gender, multiple-occupancy restrooms” in sporting complexes, stadiums, entertainment centers, conference centers, and other big venues in Illinois. Yes, “all-gender” is just what it sounds like – males and females using the same multiple-occupancy restroom at the same time, anytime. There are urinals, stalls, and partitions in co-ed bathrooms.

So our first reaction at IFI was the same as yours and your neighbor’s. Don’t they know these restrooms will be places where rapes and crimes will occur? Don’t they know that at the very least women will lose their privacy when men are in these restrooms? Don’t they know that a 16-year-old girl who needs to use the restroom is vulnerable to men who will frequent these places with evil intentions? So why would we want to create all-gender bathrooms, especially since there have been crimes committed by more than a few men in women’s restrooms in recent years?

Those are all good questions. Unfortunately, those questions aren’t at the center of debate in Springfield — yet. Like I said at the beginning, a familiar pattern has emerged.

The first complaint by the sponsor and those on the left who support this bill is that HB 1286 doesn’t really do what people think it does. The bill only legalizes and permits, not mandates, these restrooms. Well, IFI readers know this. We wrote about it last month. But some people hearing about this for the first time wrongly thought the bill mandated the restrooms, so the far-left’s been painting the picture that ALL of us are mistaken. And they’re making that the central issue of the debate. If that sounds familiar, you’re right.

In the Garden of Eden, Satan asked, “Has God really said, ‘You shall not eat from any tree of the garden’?” Satan placed doubt in Eve’s mind that she might be completely mistaken.  That’s the left’s strategy as well – a lie leading to doubt. “All opponents think this bill requires these restrooms to be built. Therefore since it doesn’t, it’s okay to pass the bill.”

We know the bill just permits these restrooms… for the time being at least. But we also know they’re going to be dangerous and that’s why we’re opposed. The left then goes to the second tactic – temptation.

As Satan said, “Well, God knows if you ate of that fruit, your eyes would be opened and you would be like God.” Hmmm…..doesn’t sound that bad, almost tempting. So Eve takes the fruit and gives it to Adam and they sin.

The left once again draws attention away from the truth by saying, “The bill merely provides the framework on how to construct these restrooms. All we’re doing is making sure that if someone does construct these restrooms, they need to do it a certain way for safety reasons.” That might sound more reasonable, but it completely masks the question of ‘Why do we need to provide the framework in the first place?’  What they are trying to avoid is that all-gender multiple occupancy restrooms are currently illegal. And common sense tells us that they’re unsafe. And there’s no amount of framework that will make them safe.

So believe it or not, legislators are not yet publicly debating your privacy or safety in legalizing these restrooms; they’re merely talking about providing the framework for construction of these restrooms which will inevitably also provide the framework for crimes against women and girls.

Even California hasn’t done what Illinois is proposing. Why? It’s unsafe. The closest California has come is proposing a single-use “transgender bathroom” in every school. They would keep the boys and girls restrooms as they are.

Christians are called to love God and love one another. We defend God’s Word here on earth and simply repeat God’s loving reasons why we should not do this or that as it will harm God’s people. We also proclaim what God says would make things better for all people.  In the Capitol, that often means opposing others who feel they are doing the right thing in their own minds.  The hard part is taking all of the slings and arrows that come from intentional misrepresentations, lies, and deceit. And it’s no fun being mocked, ridiculed, and laughed at for standing up for Christian values in this culture war. History repeats this pattern over and over for us Christians. It’s the path Jesus endured to the point of death on a cross. Yes, carried out by those He created and came to save, no less.

But the fact that it’s no surprise allows us to recognize it for what it is and forge ahead with our playbook – which is Scripture – to love God and others, pray for those who persecute us, and to defend God’s Word here on earth. So please continue to do those things.

There are many reasonable, albeit timid, legislators who need you to help them stand up against these assaults on basic values. And please know that the witness slips you filled out on-line against HB 1286 really do witness to many in our Capitol against the lie that gender is chosen by people rather than by God. (“So God created mankind in his own image…male and female he created them” – Gen. 1:27 and “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart” – Jer. 1:5)

Finally, please know that your prayers are felt and invaluable to our cause. We at IFI appreciate them. I pray every day for the far-left – for their health and welfare and their coming closer to God. This is the same prayer I say for myself and my family. This is a spiritual battle, after all.  Do we have the votes to stop HB 1286? I don’t know. I do know this, though. We have a God Who has already won the victory over Satan, both in this world and the next. Which is why God never asks us to be successful. Rather, God only asks us to be faithful to Him – both in our private lives and public capacities.

Take ACTION: Click HERE to send a message to your local state representative to ask him/her to vote against this legislation when it comes up for a vote on the House floor sometime this session. Urge them to reject this foolish woke agenda that fails to recognize biological facts. Ask them to protect the privacy, dignity and safety of all Illinois citizens, especially women and girls.

Please, speak out against this destructive bill.





More Bills Need Witness Slips – Thank You for Filing!

The Springfield Capitol is teeming with activity this week. Some of the bills we notified you about last week have not yet been called. There is still time to file witness slips on some of them. They are listed at the end.

Other bills are newly scheduled for hearings this week. To file a witness slip, please follow these simple steps:

Click on the link.
Section I, for Firm/Business, leave blank or write self – unless you represent a group.
Section II, leave blank or write self – unless you represent a group.
Section III, click either Opponent or Proponent.
Section IV, click Record of Appearance Only.
Agree to the terms and click Create Slip.

Please File PROPONENT Slips for These Bills:

HB 1072 – Requires school boards to ensure parents are free to petition the school board, provide public comment at all public meetings, have access to certain information, are well-informed on specified subject matters, have the right to meet with a pupil’s teacher at least twice per school year, and post curriculum and learning materials on the school district’s website.
Elementary & Secondary Education Committee, Wed., March 8th at 8 a.m. in C-1 Stratton.
Also, Thurs., March 9th at 12:00 p.m. in 118 Capitol.

Click HERE to file a witness slip as a proponent of HB 1072 (C-1 Stratton).
Click HERE to file a witness slip as a proponent of HB 1072 (118 Capitol).

HB 1148 and HB 2343 – Abortion clinics shall offer a woman seeking an abortion the opportunity to view her baby after 8 weeks gestation before having any abortion.
Health Care Availability & Accessibility, Tues., March 7th at 4 p.m. in C-1 Stratton.

Click HERE to file a witness slip as a proponent of HB 1148.
Click HERE to file a witness slip as a proponent of HB 2343.

HB 1162Prohibits mobile abortion units.
Health Care Availability & Accessibility, Tues., March 7th at 4 p.m. in C-1 Stratton.

Click HERE to file a witness slip as a proponent of HB 1162.

HB 1163Repeals the radical Reproductive Health Act which allows abortion through all nine months and encodes into law that unborn children have no rights.
Health Care Availability & Accessibility, Tues., March 7th at 4 p.m. in C-1 Stratton.

Click HERE to file a witness slip as a proponent of HB 1163.

 

Please File OPPONENT Slips for These Bills:

HB 1 – Legalizes psychedelic mushrooms, LSD, and other hallucinogens.
House Executive Committee, Wed., March 8th at 10 a.m. in Room 118 Capitol Bldg.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 1.

HB 3 House Committee Amendments 1 , 2, and 3 – Bans disclosure to authorities if a newborn has drugs in his/her system; changes many pronouns to gender-neutral; provide medical care to mother and newborn based on World Health Organization guidelines and not the “generally accepted standards.”
House Public Health Committee, Thurs., Match 9th, D-1 Stratton Building.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HCA 1.
Click HERE to file a witness slip against HCA 2.
Click HERE to file a witness slip against HCA 3. (gender-neutral pronouns)

HB 1485 – Suspends teaching of all American history curriculum in public schools for the 2023-24 school year. Creates a commission to “reframe” history curriculum to include all diverse viewpoints. Resumes teaching of this revamped American history in 2024-25 school year.
Elementary & Secondary Education Committee, Wed., March 8th at 8 a.m. in C-1 Stratton.
Thurs., March 9th at 12:00 p.m. in 118 Capitol.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 1485. (C-1 Stratton Bldg.)
Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 1485. (118 Capitol)

HB 1499 – Provides that a county or municipality may issue temporary event licenses to allow for the sale and consumption of cannabis, cannabis-infused products, and cannabis paraphernalia.
Executive Committee, Wed., March 8th at 10 a.m. in Room 118 Capitol.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 1499.

SB 218 – Allows physician assistants to prescribe drugs (including abortifacients) without a doctor’s authorization.
Licensed Activities Committee, Wed., March 8th at 1 p.m. in 400 Capitol.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against SB 218.

 

From Last Week:

Thank you if you have already filed a witness slip against the following bills! If not, we have included them here for your convenience as the bills were not heard in committee last week.

HB 25 – Increases the number of marijuana craft grower licenses plus allows advertising.
House Executive Committee, Wed., March 8th at 10 a.m. in 118 Capitol Bldg.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 25.

HB 29 – This bill punishes parents for disciplining their child. If a parent “transmits any verbal or visual message” intended to cause emotional distress to their child, he or she can be charged with parental bullying. If convicted, the parent would have to pay court costs and any fine imposed by the court. The fine would be placed in escrow until the child turns 18, at which time he or she would be able to purchase a certificate of deposit with the monies.
House Judiciary-Criminal Committee, Tuesday, March 7th at 4 p.m. in Room D-1 Stratton Building.
Also,Thurs. March 9 at 12 p.m. in C-1 Stratton.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 29. (D-1 Stratton)
Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 29. (C-1 Stratton)

HB 31 – Allows marijuana craft growers to have more than one license; requires 60 more craft licenses by March 15, 2024.
House Executive Committee, Wed., March 8th at 10 a.m. in 118 Capitol Bldg.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 31.

HB 39 – allows all current prisoners to vote in elections.
House Ethics and Elections Committee, Tues., March 7th at 2 p.m. in Room 413 Stratton.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 39.

HB 1046 – Requires Dept. of Public Health to establish “reproductive health clinics” across the state; allows midwives to do abortions; eliminates “neglected child” definition if controlled substances are found in newborn’s system and prohibits reporting such to authorities.
House Public Health Committee, Thurs., March 9th at 8 a.m. in D-1 Stratton.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 1046.

HB 1087 – Changes law to say that a child cannot be considered abused or neglected because a parent repeatedly uses illegal drugs.
Adoption & Child Welfare Committee, Tues., March 7th at 2 p.m., 122B Capitol Bldg.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 1087.

HB 1090 – From January 1, 1970 and thereafter, all criminal records of possession of cannabis will be expunged. (Note: It is common for criminals to plea bargain down from a more serious offense to possession.)
House Executive Committee, Wed., March 8th at 10 a.m. in 118 Capitol Bldg.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 1090.

HB 1205 – Allows for the weight of legally allowed cannabis to be deducted from the larger amount confiscated to determine an offense of possession. Prohibits search of cannabis in a vehicle.
House Executive Committee, Wed., March 8th at 10 a.m. in 118 Capitol Bldg.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 1205.

HB 2039 – Allows all private health data be made available to a local health department “for the purposes of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability” and allows Dept. of Public Health, Dept. of Human Services, and Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services to “adopt any rules necessary to implement the Act.”
House Public Health Committee, Thursday, March 9th at 8 a.m. in D-1 Stratton

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 2039.

HB 2118 – Provides that hypodermic syringes and needles can now be sold in any quantity, anywhere, anytime (instead of exclusively by a pharmacist).
House Health Care Availability and Accessibility Committee, Tues., March 7th at 4 p.m. in C-1 Stratton.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 2118.

HB 2463 – Allows anyone to file a complaint with the Attorney General to investigate pregnancy care centers to shut them down; imposes $50,000 fines on any center suspected of “deceptive practices.”
Health Care Availability & Accessibility Committee, Tues., March 7 at 4 p.m. in C-1 Stratton.

Click HERE to file a witness slip against HB 2463.

Thank you for speaking out!





At Dozens of Illinois Schools, Not ONE Proficient Student

Dozens of government schools across Illinois have been unable to produce even one single student proficient in reading or math, according to new date from the Illinois State Board of Education. In hundreds of schools across the state, just 10 percent of children are proficient in the basics. And it is getting worse.

The new state data show that less than 30 percent of students in the public “education” system achieved even basic proficiency in reading, down from a measly 37 percent in 2019. Just one fourth of children tested proficient in math, down from already unfathomably poor 32 percent just a few years earlier.

This total failure to educate children on even the most basic elements of learning comes despite massive spending levels dwarfing the cost of government “education” in most other states and countries. Even as spending ballooned, academic results declined, the state board of education’s “Report Card” for 2022 revealed.

Perhaps even more astoundingly, some of the schools that failed to produce even one proficient student in either English or math were rated as “commendable” by the Illinois education bureaucracy — the second-highest ranking possible. How the schools scored so well when the students failed so miserably was not immediately clear.

Even many of the children labeled “proficient” are barely literate at best. But while the students may not be able to read or do math properly, and they almost certainly fail just as bad in science and history, they are almost all very well versed in gender theory, climate-change alarmism, race hysteria, and more. LGBT indoctrination is mandated by law across the state, too.

Breaking down the specifics of the educational disaster, there are 30 schools across Illinois — more than two thirds of them in Chicago — where not a single student ranked even “proficient” in reading. Meanwhile, more than 50 schools across the state failed to produce one single student rated proficient in mathematics. Almost two dozen schools failed to get even one child proficient in either subject.

Critics were aghast. “The absolute failure to teach even a single child to read and do math in so many schools is yet another indictment of the state’s educational system,” explained education analysts Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner at Wirepoints.org in a commentary on the educational catastrophe sweeping Illinois.

Citing the same state data, Dabrowski and Klingner also noted that almost 20 percent of government schools in Illinois — more than 600 in total — were only able to get one in ten victims to basic reading proficiency. Over 25 percent of the schools — almost 1,000 in all — were only able to get one in ten proficient in math. And yet, they continually demand more money.

This is evidence of collective insanity, Dabrowski and Klingner concluded in their widely cited analysis of the state data. “In a sane world, schools that don’t and can’t teach a single student the most basic of skills would be shut down,” they explained. “But here, they carry on…the system thrives while students wither.”

In fact, in any other industry, not only would the entity or entities in question be shut down, the scam artists defrauding and bilking customers out of billions of dollars so flagrantly would be prosecuted for fraud and then thrown in jail. It happens all the time in other sectors of the economy not controlled by government.

Imagine, for example, a fast-food restaurant where only a handful of those who ordered a meal actually got anything remotely resembling food, while most customers were handed toxic waste or a rat carcass on a moldy bun. State police SWAT teams would be kicking in the doors by the next morning, if not before. Politicians would be tripping over themselves to condemn the horror.

And yet, what is happening with government schools is orders of magnitude worse than a mere rip-off fast-food operation peddling inedible meals. In the case of schools, the minds, hearts, and souls of innocent children are being poisoned and irreparably damaged. Meanwhile, families, churches and civilization are crumbling as a result. This is an intergenerational crime of monumental proportions.

Of course, Illinois is hardly alone when it comes to the widespread dumbing-down of children in government schools. Results from across America — even in red states — are atrocious. On average, less than one in three victims of government schools are proficient in any core subject, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (also known as The Nation’s Report Card).

But Illinois spends more, and gets even worse results, than almost all other states. This is a state and national crisis. Children are in grave danger. And as President Ronald Reagan’s National Commission on Excellent in Education warned in 1983, this so-called “education” is now literally an existential threat to America’s very survival as a nation.

Parents must understand clearly that choosing to send their children to a government indoctrination center posing as a “public school” is practically guaranteeing that they will fail to learn even the most basic subjects, to say nothing of basic morality. Not only will that make it tough to have a real job and support it family, it means those children will be easy to manipulate, deceive — and ultimately, enslave.

Fortunately, for those parents who refuse to accept such a bleak future for their children, there has never been a better time to get them out of the system. Homeschooling has never been easier. Excellent Christian schools are proliferating in churches across Illinois and beyond, thanks in part to the efforts of the Illinois Family Institute.

Millions of families have already fled the government “education” system in recent years. As the latest academic results show, it’s time for many more to join them.